It was way back in your post #767, that you stated "Evolution is too broad a concept and too loosely defined to be a legitimate scientific theory."...
I am with the rest of those asking, please elaborate...and no, your response, should in no way depend on what someone else states as the 'theory of evolution'....
You made the statement, all you are being asked to do, is explain your statement...and so far, you have failed to do so...and no doubt, other posters and the lurkers are wondering why...
Simply put, if you read through the posts of the most passionate evolution supporters, you will observe that-- while they frequently refer to a theory--they don't actually define a single "Theory of Evolution". Hence, the "Theory of Evolution", a al FR, is simply too broad to be considered a legitimate scientific theory.
BTW, Can you state the "Theory of Evolution"?