You said that evolution was too broad to be a scientific theory. I asked you in what way is it too broad. You do not need to know what my understanding of evolution is to answer that question. What you need to do is tell me what YOUR understanding, if any, of evolution is that would make you claim confidently that it's too broad to be a scientific theory. I am assuming you didn't just say that without reason, and that you have some explanation for why you think evolution is too broad to be a scientific theory.
Balls in your court. Do you have an answer?
You are proving my point. The "Theory of Evolution" has become a personal thing, and as such, it is too broad to be considered a legitimate scientific theory.