Replies

"Why is one science and the other not?"

Evolution makes testable claims. ID doesn't.

"Which theory has been denied government funding for the past 40 decades?"

ID isn't a scientific theory. Just because someone makes a philosophical/theological claim (ID) doesn't mean that the government has to fund it. By that reasoning, Scientology should also be funded by the government.

"Which perfumed prince theory has been promoted and funded?"

None that I know of.

How about that wacky claim about people and corn? Any cites for the 3% similarity you said was a fact?

Regarding man vs corn do your own homework and study nucleotides. In a 100,000 strand one nucletide difference makes a huge difference. Much less a 1% difference. A one percent difference makes a huge gap between species.

Here is a fun site that talks about how scientists at Howard Hughes University are studying the possibility that life started in clay. Seems to me they are finally beginning to look in the right place.You know, "the dust from the earth", in Genesis.

http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=655&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Just as astrophysics and evolution are slowly beginning to be studied together in some instances, so should ID and evolution and physics. As time passes I suspect at least two of the sciences to merge. Depends on whether ID is left out or not, if it's three. I wonder how much time could be saved using Genesis as the template?

I like science and think the study of evolution is necessary, as well as the study of physics, all the sciences, especially the science of the Bible.