Replies

Well this guy attacking you is definitely no scientist.

He infers he might be a historian, but I doubt even that, certainly not a professional or published historian.

On this post, (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1617533/posts?page=908#908) Old Landmarks noticed I have an uncanny grasp of the obvious LOL.

Well here is another uncanny grasp of the obvious. These people (at least this one) are not about debate. Talk past him and to the lurkers. That is who counts, not the cultist nutball with the evo-crackerjack credentials. His taunts carry about as much weight too.

Wolf

"Well this guy attacking you is definitely no scientist."

Never said I was.

"He infers he might be a historian."

I "infer" it from the degree in history I received from NCSU.

"but I doubt even that, certainly not a professional or published historian."

Is that what makes one a *true* historian?

"Old Landmarks noticed I have an uncanny grasp of the obvious LOL."

Except... you were dead wrong in 902; the question had already been answered.

"These people (at least this one) are not about debate."

The irony is palpable. You have NEVER entered one of these threads to debate, only to disrupt.

"Talk past him and to the lurkers. That is who counts, not the cultist nutball with the evo-crackerjack credentials. His taunts carry about as much weight too."

The lurkers can plainly see that it was not I who made a claim I was unwilling to back up. They're all not as dumb as you are. :)