"They cant/wont define what it is after being asked many times. So they attempt to change the subject."
BS. He has already been given a number of definitions of what evolution is. What he won't do, because he can't, is explain how evolution is too broad to be a scientific theory. HE'S the one trying to change the subject. He made the claim, but he's too much a whiner to back it up. And you're his little lap dog.
"I say they are your proof the Theory of Evolution is too broad a concept and too loosely defined to be a legitimate scientific theory."
I say you are proof that some people have no shame whatsoever, and will attach their names to the most dishonest claims in order to further their fantasies.
Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity consists of two postulates:The definition of "relativity theory" is:
1. The speed of light is the same for all observers, no matter what their relative speeds.
2. The laws of physics are the same in any inertial, non-accelerated frame of reference. The laws of physics observed by a hypothetical observer traveling with a relativistic particle must be the same as those observed by an observer who is stationary in the laboratory.
"the theory that space and time are relative concepts rather than absolute concepts".As you can see from the example, the definition of a scientific theory is not the same as a clear concise scientific statement of a scientific theory.