Still is. Your posts make no sense.
Gradualism is a misnomer anyway. The central premise of science is that past events can be explained by processes and phenomena that can be observed in the present. Some processes are slow and some are catastrophic, but they can be understood in current terms. Nothing you have said adds anything to the discussion.
Agassiz disputed the gradualist position. His is currently the accepted position on the matter, to wit, big stuff counts more!