To: atlaw
Useless to further discuss this. Tired of arguing. Macro-evolution doesn't impress me. It lacks the ring of truth even without its lack of evidence, which is why the debate wasn't ended long ago.
Another time.
![](http://home.hiwaay.net/~wterrell/william.gif)
772 posted on
04/06/2006 9:32:50 AM PDT by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: William Terrell
Macro-evolution doesn't impress me. It lacks the ring of truth even without its lack of evidence, which is why the debate wasn't ended long ago. The real debate has ended a long time ago. Scientists (so-named because they actually understand science) almost 100% unanimously accept the theory of evolution on its strong merits, and have for many decades. The fact that the debate persists in the general public only makes a statement about the pervasive and unsettling lack of understanding of science among the general population.
777 posted on
04/06/2006 9:42:03 AM PDT by
Quark2005
(Confidence follows from consilience.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson