[jec41]

And just as soon as you show me how to create life. No demonstration, no explanation.

Science doesn't have a observation of fact of creation or ID and does not claim how to create life. Creation and ID make such claims. Provide the observed material fact of ID or creation and how they created life.

[William Terrell]

For basic elements to eventually end in the vast diversity of plant, animal and insect life today by random action, you have to, at some point, have life come from nonlife, or the theory collapses.

The moment you presuppose life and start from there, to avoid an intelligent creator, you must explain how that life came into being. You try to avoid this corundum by stating that the theory doesn't need to address that.

It absolutely does. I'm not impressed so far.