Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
He didn't notice a fact ~ he came up with an idea for a model.

Big difference.

Maybe in your mind however he constituted theory using the method of science. The method of science is observation of a material fact, evidence and emperical evidence of the fact and a explination of the fact. Theories are composed of facts and laws. It is not the model of evolution.

527 posted on 04/05/2006 7:49:51 PM PDT by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies ]


To: jec41
Darwin was running ahead of the pack he was in, and the scientific method was pinned down pretty much after he was gone from the scene.

It's coincidental that his methods resemble the modern approach.

Where he stepped off the planet was with his sexual selection theories ~ although they are still popular, other, more rational bases for the observations keep getting thought up. Remember, for Darwin, long separations from his wife may have given him a lot of ideas. With the animals, it's simply chemistry.

533 posted on 04/05/2006 7:56:03 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson