You have not yet answered, and I am still curious. Do you have actual statements of substance that you have not yet provided, or do you only have attacks of ridicule that do not even address the information being presented?
My first WAS as much a statement of substance as this nonsense:
Huge predators would have lurked in Tiktaalik's rivers and lakes, study co-leader Shubin says—perhaps one reason why Tiktaalik appears to have been headed for land.
Yea! I'm sure this creature was thinking "Gee, it's very vicious out here in the deep. I think I'll learn to grow mini-legs over the next several million years so I can take a look-see on land and see if it's safe. If so, I'll then spend another several million years morphing myself into a 'land critter'"
And you call that substative?