To: CarolinaGuitarman; Sun; Right Wing Professor
Well let me put it this way. I knew at 2 yrs old or less the physical realty of the hallway.
Now, even if this/was use of an analogy by you, it is so absurd as to be ********, but I am glad that the science method has guided you in these areas throughout all of these years /sarc>
But now I think we need a genuine evo scholar scientist to weigh in for your side on your analogy there.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1609687/posts?page=1343#1343
Shall you ping RWP in for it?
Awaiting with anticipation LOLOL,
Wolf
1,480 posted on
04/12/2006 9:19:27 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: RunningWolf
Wolf has to eat.
Wolf out
1,481 posted on
04/12/2006 9:20:13 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: RunningWolf; All
Here are over 500 skeptical of Darwinism, free-thinking scientists:
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
Check out their credentials.
When I checked a couple of months ago, it was 400. The list is growing.
Now besides this list, there are other free-thinking skeptical scientists.
1,482 posted on
04/12/2006 9:25:03 PM PDT by
Sun
(Evo scientists don't want to lose their perks, so they insist evo is a fact.)
To: RunningWolf
" Now, even if this/was use of an analogy by you, it is so absurd as to be..."
Back to this again? I gave you the benefit of the doubt, thought that maybe, just maybe, you would react positively and civilly to a serious discussion about epistemology. You crapped on my effort and resorted to the usual ad hominem, brainless attacks you have so trademarked. You aren't capable of understanding what I wrote, Mordo.
What about the post where I made you look like an idiot after you obnoxiously asked for any evidence that Darwin thought that there was more than one cell, and I had such evidence? Why not address that? :)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson