To: jec41
That was a very kind reply. I appreciate that. I've been giving so much of this a lot of thought. I find it all so very engaging and intellectually stimulating. It's pretty funny at times too. So thanks for having me! I will keep an open mind. My question, if they sound skeptical at times, are to satisfy my curiosity. I might play devil's advocate from time to time, but, and you will probably notice this, I'll do it from both perspectives. It's good to throw out a good challenge whether it be to a creationist, or evolutionist, since I am a creation evolutionist. I am amazed by the level on knowledge on these threads. It certainly has me studying, which I enjoy. I've been studying evolution, and the many different interpretations of creation, as well as philosophy. I thrive on learning. It makes me a better teacher for my kids, and makes life much more interesting.
1,268 posted on
04/08/2006 6:37:44 PM PDT by
Conservative Texan Mom
(Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
To: Conservative Texan Mom
philosophyPay particular interest to Descartes. Though not accepted he provoked much thought.
1,269 posted on
04/08/2006 6:53:13 PM PDT by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: Conservative Texan Mom
I have a question. What happens if science is forced to accept Creation or ID as a fact even if it is or is not? Who gets to explain the ID or God?
1,270 posted on
04/08/2006 8:03:48 PM PDT by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson