... Which is the opposite of a "hoyesnym"?
But I gotta say, does that mean that if the pro-ID people got THEIR own dictionary, would that make it correct, or does this separate dictionary only apply for the evo THEORY?
The pro-ID people are presently engaged in attempting to change the definition of science in an effort to claim ID is scientific. This in and of itself should be a convincing demonstration that ID isn't science.
We're not going to have to explain again why there's nothing wrong with a theory (or "THEORY" as you put it), again, are we? You know, as in "germ THEORY," "gravitational THEORY," "atomic THEORY"?
If you haven't yet grasped that each discipline has its own specialized vocabulary, or find that suspicious, you should consider continuing your education. Otherwise you might go around expecting to be able to taste quarks because they are classified into flavors.
Sorry, I'm a free thinker. There are scientists that have more education than you or I, that agree with me, so what does continuing education have to do with it?
I'm also so secure in my beliefs that I don't need to put people down who don't disagree with me, as you and some other evos have attempted to do. Thou doth protest toooooo much.
ID is a scientific theory, and Evo is a scientific theory.