.if its a deliberate attempt to mislead people, that is indeed, the moral low ground.
I have to admit, I've reached the point where I assume this is the case. Perhaps I should step back more often and reconsider this. However, if I do and find that in every one of the first 20 cases I examine I find I was spot on, I'll quite wasting my time and resume assuming.
quite = quit
I will admit to you, there are certain posters, who I definitely, in my minds list, would include as those who are actually deliberately attempting to mislead people, and I do consider them to be of low moral character...some I am not sure of, so I give them the benefit of the doubt...and then every once in a while, someone comes along, who actually asks probing questions, appears to hold one opinion, but does take the time to examine the evidence, and then admits that perhaps they were mistaken in their original analysis, and come around to seeing things in a different light...but that is really quite rare...
I leave it to you, to guess which posters I put into my different categories...its all subjective, after all..