[Eagle Eye]

This makes the 3rd or 4th time you've mentioned the fact that the individual was a teenage girl. Is this important to your argument?

Duh.

If he had been 100 meters away showing himself to an old woman it would be different. Since he was in close proximity on the subway and it was a teenage girl, yes, it makes a difference. But that's why some of us get paid to exercise judgement and discretion and you get encouragement to go out and meet living women, it is because you don't understand why what happened is criminal and not just offensive.

[robertpaulsen]

"If he had been 100 meters away showing himself to an old woman it would be different"

So you're saying that if this pervert flashed your mother, that would be fine with you. Golly, you're fun to watch.

"it is because you don't understand why what happened is criminal and not just offensive."

Oh, I find his behavior to be criminal. I just don't understand why you do.

And I'm beginning to think that muggs99 might even say that flashing is a protected first amendment right to free expresssion. Though I could be wrong.