[PatrickHenry]

What was just posted to you was taken (without attribution) from yet another lying, dirt-bag, moronic creationist website, here: What is the origin of the "Geologic Column"?. You gotta click on "Scientific Evidence for Creation" in the left margin to find the trash that was posted.

[PatrickHenry]

I just noticed that the url was given at the end of that post. It didn't stand out as a link, and I didn't read through to the end of that large, unformatted paragraph.

[Coyoteman]

What was just posted to you was taken (without attribution) from yet another lying, dirt-bag, moronic creationist website, here: What is the origin of the "Geologic Column"?. You gotta click on "Scientific Evidence for Creation" in the left margin to find the trash that was posted.

Actually the last line of the post had an attribution. That's a cut above many of our debating partners.

[Creationist]

from yet another lying, dirt-bag, moronic creationist website, here: What is the origin of the "Geologic Column"?. You gotta click on "Scientific Evidence for Creation" in the left margin to find the trash that was posted.

Science = the state or fact of knowing; knowledge

The people who study creation science are as erudite as those who study evolution.

So the statement from yet another lying, dirt-bag, moronic evolutionist website would also be a true statement also. But I did not say that to be malign just to state the fact that again it can be looked at from two prospectives. I genually read the web sites to under stand the concept that you worship as fact, but both sides should not draggle the other just to make a point.
Though we will probably never be amicable on this great polemic, I will try to be sangfroid. It seems that what I believe to be the truth gets evolutionist into kerfuffle. I will remain sanguine and would never perform a defenestration on an evolutionist no matter how obstreperous they can be.

Though evolution is spurious an perfidious the believers are diligent to scrutinize with disdain creation believers. Evolution will be evanescent even though erudite people enhance the cause with spurious information.
In the end when you juxtapose the two theories that some will see the desultory in evolution.