The entire theory is out of its current range. No one observed the assent of man, yet it is taught as a fact. Evolution is postualtion based on speculation and not observation. Abiogenesis is an easily proven theory. All one needs to do is to sterilize an environment in which life has never existed and add time and a little sunshine and see if life generates itself. No one is ready to even attempt that experiment as it is ludicrous.
If science finds that it can be applied, then it will be included.
Abiogenesis was taught as the FOUNDATION of Evolution when I was in high school. Now it is apparently gone and evolution is left with no foundation.
BTW I forgot that I left this thread. Please don't ping me back. Thanks.
Let's see, on one hand we have a mountain of fossil evidence going back nearly 6 million years and an even bigger mountain of genetic evidence giving a detailed account of man's evolution from a primitive, ape-like critter to his present glory; on the other hand we have a creation story written down by goatherders 2500 years ago. Which one has more validity...
Evolution is postualtion based on speculation and not observation.
Bull puckey. Evolution, in action, has been observed in both the wild and the laboratory (evolution, remember, is a change in allele frequency within a population over generations). Evolution is tested every time a new fossil is discovered or another genome is sequenced.
You might actually want to learn something about the subject before spouting off on these threads.