[P-Marlowe]

The argument is that markets produce results that no single agent could achieve, and that this does not imply the existence of a higher intelligence.

The human body is infinitely more complicated than any economic market and yet you claim that the human body, with all it's interconnected systems for the sustenance and reproduction of life are nothing more than the product of spinning atoms and time. Yet no one can even begin to explain the existence of the atoms themselves, much less how the application of time and energy to those atoms could bring about even one single celled life form, much less an organism that sees, hears, tastes, thinks, reproduces itself and sustains itself thorough a complex nervous system and digestive systems.... ad infinitum.

All you have is the existence of some bones that have turned to rocks to support your theory that any of this is even remotely possible, much less that it was likely.

In essence the evidence is clear that what we see and even the fact that we see it, is the result of some supernatural intervention of a kind which we are wont to even imagine.

[jwalsh07]

Economic markets have purpose and goals, they have direction. Evolution has no direction. The analogy falls flatter than the earth. :-}

[Virginia-American]

...All you have is the existence of some bones that have turned to rocks to support your theory that any of this is even remotely possible, much less that it was likely....

Also a bit of DNA evidence.

From the above. How do you explain this without common descent? How much evidence is required before doubt becomes unreasonable?