Skip to comments.
What Are Creationists Afraid Of?
The New Individualist ^
| 1/2006
| Ed Hudgins
Posted on 01/26/2006 1:47:10 PM PST by jennyp
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,120, 1,121-1,140, 1,141-1,160 ... 1,261-1,276 next last
To: Heartlander
I win, you lose. You can't handle I demolished your argument about Darwin, Mendel, and eugenics, so you bring in a completely irrelevant *point*. How pathetic. Now go away.
To: Westbrook
Nobody has addressed any of the philosophical points in my original post.
Maybe because it was nothing but a load of "argument from consequence", founded in faulty premises and having no bearing whatsoever on the validity of the theory of evolution.
1,122
posted on
01/29/2006 4:30:57 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Fine. Darwin and Mendel are in a room discussing various topics. They turn to you and ask, Do you believe that human consciousness ultimately comes from mindlessness?
1,123
posted on
01/29/2006 4:31:52 PM PST
by
Heartlander
(History is for the dogmatic fools to ignore and repeat - thus it is science.)
To: Westbrook
Oh, and you will have to provide the link to the enumerated list of Creationist Lies, or is the existance of that list an Evolutionist Lie?link & learn
1,124
posted on
01/29/2006 4:32:45 PM PST
by
Quark2005
(Divination is NOT science.)
To: Heartlander
Idiot. When you decide to stick to the topic you originally pinged me on, then we can talk. Until then, go away loser.
To: Heartlander
Why are you trying to change the subject? Are you really too much of a coward to admit that you made a mistake?
1,126
posted on
01/29/2006 4:33:32 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: VadeRetro
So Adam really wasn't supposed to eat that fruit. How about this one?
1,127
posted on
01/29/2006 4:34:02 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Dimensio; Heartlander
Yes, he IS that much of a coward.
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Youve won the argument in your mind. Hey, now answer the stupid question - Do you believe that human consciousness ultimately comes from mindlessness?
1,129
posted on
01/29/2006 4:36:33 PM PST
by
Heartlander
(History is for the dogmatic fools to ignore and repeat - thus it is science.)
To: Heartlander
I said go away, or stick to the topic, moron.
To: Dimensio
1,131
posted on
01/29/2006 4:38:00 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(True conservatives revere Adam Smith, Charles Darwin, and the Founding Fathers.)
To: Coyoteman
If it's growing in the woods I leave it there.
1,132
posted on
01/29/2006 4:44:20 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: Dimensio
Ive now been called an idiot and a loser. Your friend isnt being a very good agnostic.
1,133
posted on
01/29/2006 4:44:56 PM PST
by
Heartlander
(History is for the dogmatic fools to ignore and repeat - thus it is science.)
To: All; anyone
Does any person believe that human consciousness ultimately comes from mindlessness?
1,134
posted on
01/29/2006 4:48:42 PM PST
by
Heartlander
(History is for the dogmatic fools to ignore and repeat - thus it is science.)
To: Heartlander
Does any person believe that human consciousness ultimately comes from mindlessness?
I categorically do not believe that human consciousness ultimately comes from mindlessness.
We are expressions of his consciousness and his conscious life-force.
Wolf
1,135
posted on
01/29/2006 4:52:41 PM PST
by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: RunningWolf
Im curious, how could human consciousness be a subset of mindlessness? If Neo-Darwinian principles are true than they should apply to a mindless and undirected universe.
There cannot be any direction or goal. Even morality must be made up in the human mind and does not exist elsewhere - beauty and design are only constructs in our mind and the human mind can not be designed by or for any purpose or reason according to Darwinism.
To: PatrickHenry
I think this snippet is
a little better for that quote:
The woman ... suddenly loudly exclaimed, 'my goodness, when I hear a man read scripture, it makes me HOT!'. I was startled, and I calibrated this experience to some other Sunday afternoon experiences I recalled.
1,138
posted on
01/29/2006 5:08:45 PM PST
by
jennyp
(WHAT I'M READING NOW: your mind)
To: Dimensio
Maybe because it was nothing but a load of "argument from consequence", founded in faulty premises and having no bearing whatsoever on the validity of the theory of evolution. Really?
Doesn't the following come close to characterizing fundamental Evolutionist/Materialist premises?
- Everything came from nothing out of nowhere for no apparent reason.
- Life is just a curious side-effect of an unknowing, uncaring cosmos.
Does this not give rise to a hedonistic or nihilistic response? Since, when you die you are just so much compost, then the best we can hope for is a life of self-gratification and a painless extinction.
1,139
posted on
01/29/2006 5:10:54 PM PST
by
Westbrook
(Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
To: Westbrook
"Everything came from nothing out of nowhere for no apparent reason."
Nothing to do with evolution.
"Life is just a curious side-effect of an unknowing, uncaring cosmos."
Nothing to do with evolution.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,120, 1,121-1,140, 1,141-1,160 ... 1,261-1,276 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson