They lied.
So, according to you and the Schindlers, "It was MS who took the action to destroy the comradeship with the parents." Correct?
According to Judge Greer's court order in 2000:
"On February 14, 1993, this amicable relationship between the parties was severed. While the testimony differs on what may or may not have been promised to whom and by whom, it is clear to this court that such severance was predicated upon money and the fact that Mr. Schiavo was unwilling to equally divide his loss of consortium award with Mr. and Mrs. Schindler."
Hey! How about that! Just as I said.
Judge greer's statements are not evidence of anything other than his own mishandling of Terri's case. The evidence is 180° contrary to greer's rulings. So it's pretty ridiculous to hold his rulings up as proof that his rulings are reflective of the evidence. When you compare his rulings to the evidence, they don't match up.
That is a perfect example of how Greer's court chose to take MS's side and declare it truth/fact. If you read the original transcripts of the Pearse report, you will see that it was MS's word vs the Shindlers word.
http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo/122998%20Schiavo%20Richard%20Pearse%20GAL%20report.pdf
Specifically on page 4: "In February, 1993, the ward's husband and her parents had a falling out. Mr SCHIAVO claim the argument arose because he refused to share the settlement money with the SCHINDLERS. They on the other hand, claim that Mr. SCIAVO failed to honor commitments he had previously made to continue to seek aggressive treatment for the ward's condition.. The SHINDLERS retained counsel and sought Mr. SCHIAVO's removal as guardian, but were ultimately unsuccessful."
Another piece of evidence which clearly shows the Greer court took MS's side even when the Pearse report said it was just his word vs their word. The bottom line is that you were not there and I was not there, it was his word against theirs. For no reason whatsoever the court decided to take his word over the parents and declare it a fact.