That's a total non-sequiter. The child is still alive, and that's the point. It needs a father, it doesn't care how it got to be in this world, it cares what happens now. It's not it's fault.
Same as abortion. It doesn't matter if you had a drunken one-night-stand with a total slut, I think you should have to have responsiblity for the child that union created, even if she lied to you and told you she was on the pill. There is something more at stake now.
That's a total non-sequiter. The child is still alive, and that's the point. It needs a father, it doesn't care how it got to be in this world, it cares what happens now. It's not it's fault.
Same as abortion. It doesn't matter if you had a drunken one-night-stand with a total slut, I think you should have to have responsiblity for the child that union created, even if she lied to you and told you she was on the pill. There is something more at stake now. The question is, who should pay for the child? Why hasn't the real biological father figured in any of this? Maybe you should pay for it, since the child carries as many of your genes as the poor guy being forced to pay for it.