You have a twisted sense of morality in my view. You demand "individual responsibility" from the one man for misjudging his wife, but you demand none from her for engaging in deception and adultery, nor any from her fellow adulterer. We obviously aren't on the same wavelength and probably won't be.
He stated that he was not unsure of its paternity at birth and there's every reason to think this was true.
There is no doubt whatsoever that I understand the issues involved, notwithstanding your pointless remark.
Wrong. I think the woman is still responsible for the child, I'm not aliving her of anything. What's more, I think it would be an excellent arguement for the father to get custody of the children if he wants it, and I think that she should have to pay alemony and/or child support if that's the case.
Men and women are different. I thought conservatives knew that. Sometimes that requires them to have different rolls. Again, I thought conservatives knew that.
I also thought that they realized parents were of upmost importance in a childs life, and that life isn't always fair, but that it doesn't aliviate you of your responsibilities.
Because if these points of view aren't 'conservative', I guess I'm a liberal, because these are the things that I think.
He stated that he was not unsure of its paternity at birth and there's every reason to think this was true.
Obviously, he was unsure, even if he didn't think he was.
There is no doubt whatsoever that I understand the issues involved, notwithstanding your pointless remark.
If you had, you would have adressed them as opposed to merely dismissing them as pointless, which they are not.