Never mind that the money taken from the one man is usually also taken from his own legitimate children. This is especially the case in states like California that provide only 30 days to contest paternity, oftentimes 'established' without the knowledge of the non-father who doesn't even know that he's been named, in a number of cases by women he doesn't even know, because they have provided a name to Social Services which is incorrectly tracked to him, and then for whatever reason he never receives the summons that is delivered to someone else.
I've head of such laws and cases.
This is probably the most scarily backwards statement I've ever read. Are you actually going to argue we should go back to the days where kids are 'bastards' and outcast because of what their parents did?
Because that is just what you are doing. You are making distinctions on the worth of the child based on who their parents are, and how moral their actions in conception are.
And what the heck does pergery have to do with this case?