Posted on 01/09/2006 12:19:01 AM PST by RWR8189
THAT is SCARY.
It's okay to rip the child away from the only father he has known. Just leave the money.
How about trying her for GRAND LARCENY?
This sounds SO Hillary. "We did it for the children."
The family bond is the foundation of child raising. Not the individual people who make up the family. The divorce broke that bond. The guy is now no more than somebody who makes the kid feel good. Any man can do that. The damage to this kids was done at the divorce, the rest is just sophistry.
I believe that having a parent die in a loving family is less damaging to a child than a divorce. This whole argumen is sickening.
Never mind that the entire concept of this "family" is based upon FRAUD? "Sophistry" is defined as a "plausible but fallacious argumentation." You, my friend, are GUILTY.
Oops. I misread your post. You hit the nail on the head. The biological father is issue, not the poor sap who got lied to.
In several states, your precious "law" says otherwise. There, they even feel that kid's are better off without a father. That is why the law has been so sadly twisted. Single women raising children without fathers, just "some man's paycheck."
All of your arguments support this perversion of the family.
Leni
Calling this "a family" after the divorce, and argueing how damaging it would be to the child for this guy to cut out (when the real damage has already been done by the divorce)...is sophistry.
the gentleman who is being extorted either needs to quit his job and become a liberal or illegal alien. choice no. 2 is to get a gun and do justice on his own, god knows the jackals in black robes dont know a thing about justice.
A direct result of radical feminism.
Not if I'm not the co-owner of the account. Spouses can't access *anything* these days without permission or joint ownership.
Yah, so what? A lot has changed since the Constitution was originally written too. Does that make all of it's ideas void?
What makes the ideas void is towering intellects like yours contriving ways to justify discrimination. You sit impassively for women acquiring unconstitutional privileges, but expect men to take the same responsibility as when women were subordinate.
That is perposterous unless you consider parenthood to be nothing more then having sex with results. A father is more then a sperm doner.
Not when it comes to abortion he isn't. Fathers don't abort: mothers do.
No, he's of questionable character if he would ditch a person he called his son or daughter because of his own convenience.
Being victimized is not "convenience."
It's also worth noting that he claims not to want to ditch the boy, but rather to control how the money is spent, and that he and his current wife have opened up a college account. Of course, there's always the chance he could be lying, but from the sound of things he's certainly the most honorable one in this whole equation.
And, yeah, I've pretty much rejected the whole 'mutually-arranged sperm donor' defense from the wife..
I agree.However,it must be noted,and noted clearly,that only one parent has sinned here.The other parents "sin" was that he trusted that his wife wasn't as "morally flexible" as she was.
Another thing I wonder is if the law is changed what happens to children born to infertile couples if either an anonymous egg or sperm donor is used to conceive?
In the case of a divorce and DNA test that shows that one parent is not biological then what happens? Do they go back to the sperm clinic and try to find out who the donor is to sue him for child support?
If I were to ever use DNA donation to conceive I would make sure I had an iron-clad agreement with my spouse to make sure that they couldn't weasel out if the marriage went south, just by virtue of the DNA not being theirs.
LQ
DINGDINGDINGDING...WINNER WINNER WINNER!
If it was about supporting the children, there would be flat rate child support for each locality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.