To: varyouga
Except, of course, for the fact that it would be difficult to tax No more so than 'shine, bathtub gin, and so forth. If it were legal to grown, sell and buy, most users wouldn't bother growing it, any more than most drinkers run their own stills. After all, all that takes is some sugar and some tubing, a bit more if you are trying to make beer or drinkable wine.
123 posted on
12/27/2005 9:32:58 AM PST by
El Gato
To: El Gato
all that takes is some sugar and some tubingIf anything, it appears to be considerably more difficult to grow high-potency marijuana than to distill alcohol.
127 posted on
12/27/2005 9:39:23 AM PST by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: El Gato
"No more so than 'shine, bathtub gin, and so forth."
I don't think so. I knew some fellas that grew in their bedroom. All it took was some soil and lamps. Growing for personal use is very simple. Hemp is a very durable plant that requires little maintenance or chemicals.
Making good shine takes considerably more skill. Especially since you can get poisoned from drinking poorly made shine.
Plus I have yet to try homemade stuff as good as the store-bought. And in Russia almost everyone has a still to make their own.
168 posted on
12/27/2005 3:00:57 PM PST by
varyouga
(I no longer fear death. I only fear the day when the DUmmies take over.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson