[Coyoteman]

If it cannot be reproduced it is just a theory isn't it? Or have the rules of scientific investigation been dumbed down in order to accomodate the belief system of evolution.?

No, and no.

This is what a theory is. Reproducing something in the laboratory has nothing to do with it.

Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses"

[The Lumster]

tested hypotheses

So how does one go about testing evolution?

Without valid testing it remains a theory and all theories require some element of belief. I fully admit that I.D. is a theory, no more testable than evolution.

And as I've said I'm not really defending I.D. I'm asking by what right does a federal court require the teaching of one theory over another?