Sorry, I didn't phrase myself well. From a scientific standpoint Genesis as literal history has already been gutted, sliced, diced, and incinerated. My actual point was that proving a God exists would hardly contradict the evidence in support of evolution. It would merely indicate that the God which exists is not the one you and others who take Genesis literally imagine to exist.
Does from a scientific standpoint mean you can't replicate the conditions with an experiment and test it to find out if it is true?
"proving a God exists would hardly contradict the evidence in support of evolution. It would merely indicate that the God which exists is not the one you and others who take Genesis literally imagine to exist."
I guess it depends on what that god thought about evolution. Maybe the newly found god that was proved to exist could refute evolution. Maybe I am still confused.
And anybody who isn't vested in destroying religion, and who wants to understand why it is that otherwise "intelligent" people are so scared of the evolutionary movement, needs look no farther than this post and others here to see how Evolution is the key to the war against God and his followers on the Earth that he created.