[narby]

the judge would declare unacceptable by law, but the very notion that intelligent design can explain the organization of matter that behaves according to predictable laws.

Ok, God created all the physical laws. That's great philosophy, but where's your evidence, other than philosophy?

Like the judge said, ID is not science. And since the proponents of it in this particular case were Christians, and believed they were promoting Christianity by promoting ID, then it's religion. And religion just isn't science.

Don't you get that?

[lonestar67]

I really think Christians should start arguing in public that Darwin was an intelligent designer. There is good historical evidence on this point. From this line of analysis, they should suggest that Darwinism actually affirms a biblical worldview.

Using the bogus establishment logic of the court, it will then be necessary to censor ALL evolutionary biology from public school curriculums since Christians derive an affirmation of their faith. Therefore, Darwin's theory it constitutes an establishment of religion.