To: donh
I think we are at an impasse on causality and nothingness. You made some good points, albeit not persuasive enough for me. While I think it might be useful to explore the implications of causality not being true, perhaps we have explored enough tangents for this thread.
3,289 posted on
02/02/2006 12:35:27 PM PST by
unlearner
(You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
To: unlearner
implications of causality not being true I have not contended causality is not "true". I have contended that causality is a human classification scheme, not a tangible force of nature. Much in the same manner as I concede that horses and zebras are two different species, even though zebras and horses can interbreed, because I accept human classification schemes as being adequately "true".
3,292 posted on
02/03/2006 12:18:57 AM PST by
donh
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson