"I am not an opponent of supernatural explanations. I am an opponent of supernatural science."
Between the two of us, you are the only one trying to make this into an issue of the supernatural. I have avoided any connotations of the supernatural in my assertion. Any inferences of the supernatural are philosophical.
Which is why it is such a good camel's-nose-in-the-tent strategy. Were it not for supernatural sources of design, this discussion would have never left the back pages of the sci-fi pulps, which is where it belongs on it's merits.