Here is your orginal hypothesis, which you claim is both supportable and falsifiable: Life can only originate through intelligent intervention.
You can pretend with all your might that this doesn't have implications. You will be wrong.
I have answered this many times. Please stop repeating the same foolish question. Laws suggest universal conditions, and no one is advocating that laws be required to support their exclusive claims.
You have not answered this many times. You have simply repeated yourself. Are you now retracting the claim that your hypothesis is supportable? If so, then you must be aware that you cannot find a method of support. Since you have apparently realized your error and we now agree, I will drop this line of inquiry.
By the way, since I must have missed that part of our discussion, when did you reclassify your statement from "hypothesis" to "law?"
"You can pretend with all your might that this doesn't have implications."
Answered already. Re read, rinse, repeat.
"By the way, since I must have missed that part of our discussion, when did you reclassify your statement from 'hypothesis' to 'law'?"
You cannot get out of this so easily. I never claimed my assertion to be a law. I demonstrated that accepted scientific theories also make exclusive statements which do not comply with your requirement of support.
Again, when you can explain how the universal and exclusive aspect of the law of gravity is supported as you demand, get back to me.