Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: donh

There is no more thought required on my part. The facts are in the Bible if you choose to read them.


2,930 posted on 01/01/2006 6:29:14 PM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2929 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
There is no more thought required on my part. The facts are in the Bible if you choose to read them.

All things being equal, I'll take the Pope's word over yours that there is no significant conflict between belief in science and belief in God.

2,931 posted on 01/01/2006 7:35:59 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2930 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
...and, by the way, most scientists do not profess to be athiests, many are card-carrying christians, and many believe in intelligent design of some sort.

The vast majority of scientists, however, have no trouble understanding that Intelligent Design does not remotely qualify as a scientific theory.

2,935 posted on 01/02/2006 9:47:27 AM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2930 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin; PatrickHenry
There is no more thought required on my part.

Congrats, you have summed up the entire ID/Creationist game in a mere 9 words. Perhaps it's even good enough to make the hall of fame, eh, PH?
2,938 posted on 01/02/2006 10:26:03 AM PST by whattajoke (I'm back... kinda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2930 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson