[VadeRetro]

So far you have presented little substance by way of scientific argument...

Just noticed this. (I skim you very lightly now. Sorry about all the typing you seem to be doing.)

There is nothing to say about the science of your premise. There is no science to argue except for illustrating that the puddle in your backyard is not an abiogenesis lab and it would be a classic creationist strawman to insist otherwise. I've been leading you along Socratically to admitting what you no doubt already know in that regard. Somehow, you don't seem to want to play.

[unlearner]

" Just noticed this. (I skim you very lightly now. Sorry about all the typing you seem to be doing.) There is nothing to say about the science of your premise. There is no science to argue except for illustrating that the puddle in your backyard is not an abiogenesis lab and it would be a classic creationist strawman to insist otherwise. I've been leading you along Socratically to admitting what you no doubt already know in that regard. Somehow, you don't seem to want to play."

You aren't just reading lightly, you are thinking lightly too.

You do not even appear to know what science is. Perhaps you are a scientist yourself, which would make this more inexcusable. Have you learned anything of the philosophy of science even in passing?

All you can do is state something is unscientific as if your opinion makes it so. You have not used any form of logic to demonstrate your side of the argument.

At this point I have lost confidence in your ability to do so.

At least some opponents around here actually took a stab at it. You have posted more than about any of them and said pretty much nothing.