[donh]

wolfie will play this stupid game with you all night if you let him. But this is a honeytrap. So what if there are 500 doctoral theses that cite Piltdown Man? There are probably 500+ doctoral theses that cite findings in phrenology, and the ether. His obtuse, pretentious annoying delivery seems to shut off the critical portion of the brain, and causes otherwise cautious people wrestle over meaningless battles whose outcome doesn't matter a tinker's poop.

Why on God's green earth does anybody give a rat's patootie whether or not there are exactly 500 scientific doctoral theses whose subject is Piltdown man? Or is it which cite Piltdown Man--or is it even science PHDs we're talking about? Why take up such a challenge so vaguely framed you can't answer the previous question?--it's just a side show to try to blow off evo credibility on a meaningless point of protocol.

[Thatcherite]

So what if there are 500 doctoral theses that cite Piltdown Man?

I am just curious to see if he can cite even one. A creationist made the claim that there were 500, and has been roundly ridiculed for repeatedly failing to provide even one. Cringing Cur has at implied that he has evidence of some (though I note that he was careful not to say how many), so I've answered his questions. Either he provides some now and retains a shred of credibility, or he fails to and joins Dimensio's "proven liars" list.

[Sun]

Wow! Am I ever jealous of RunningWolf. He must be pretty effective, that you had to call the whole gang in. lol

Do you know there was a time when only one man believed in Darwinism - Darwin!!

But yet evos believed Darwin, and he was wrong.