If that is the solution for those opposed on religious grounds to the teaching of evolution, then that likewise should be the solution for those who were "offended" by the Dover ID policy statement being read.
If that so offended them, then why didn't they just skip biology? If the parents were so offended, why didn't they just put their children in private school?
If nobody forced these offended atheists to take biology in Dover then they had no right to complain.
Of course you have evidence that the plaintiffs were atheists, don't you?