Replies

I don't HAVE to read EVERY post here...the arguments NEVER change. And only a precious few are actually arguments as opposed to slams against those who disagree with you.
For ANY "scientific fact" to BECOME a scientific fact there MUST, at SOME point, be a fact to support it. 150 years for evolution and not a single one.
I'm so sorry my disagreement with you has so pissed you off...(not sorry at all).
Time to get over it..and yourself.

For ANY "scientific fact" to BECOME a scientific fact there MUST, at SOME point, be a fact to support it. 150 years for evolution and not a single one.

Huh. Better get a letter out to the world's paleontology museums and university departments. They seem to be laboring under the delusion that there is a bit of tangible evidence.

For ANY "scientific fact" to BECOME a scientific fact there MUST, at SOME point, be a fact to support it. 150 years for evolution and not a single one.

Actually there are trillions of them with new ones being generated by the thousands every day. New findings in genomics, combinatorial genetics, quorum sensing and any of the new disciplines in biology support the good old fossil record and comparative morphologies of anatomies, organs and cells.

Now if you could just dig that billion year old fossil of a homo sapiens out of the attic, you'd be in business.

(By the way, what's the 13 sisters thing?)

I don't HAVE to read EVERY post here

True, but you seem to be wallowing in ignorance, and now you've just admitted that your ignorance is deliberate.

the arguments NEVER change.

Not our fault that the creationists can't come up with new material when their old lies are debunked. Take it up with the creationists who repeat the same demonstratably false claims over and over again.

For ANY "scientific fact" to BECOME a scientific fact there MUST, at SOME point, be a fact to support it.

Evolution is a theory supported by a plethora of facts.

150 years for evolution and not a single one.

This statement is simply false, though you did admit previously that you choose to remain willfully ignorant, so it's not surprising that you'd make such a statement.

For ANY "scientific fact" to BECOME a scientific fact there MUST, at SOME point, be a fact to support it. 150 years for evolution and not a single one.

You seem to have a confused notion of what is a fact in science.

A fact in science is essentially a datapoint which appears reliable; that is, an observation which is confirmed repeatedly by independent and competent observers.

The following fossil is a "fact" which supports the theory of evolution, showing that your comment "150 years for evolution and not a single one" is incorrect.

Fossil: KNM-ER 3733 Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)

Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)

Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)

Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)

Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)

Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)

Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406- A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)

Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)

See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33