Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Probably only necessary if you want to avoid property tax issues and legal recourse; like all the other parents who homeschool or send their kids to private schools. Those people aren't given a tax break or reimbursement. Any property owner has to pay school taxes even if they have no kids in the public school system. I don't have a problem with restoring money to the parent who homeschools or private schools but many people do. The reason for that is that somewhat twisted reasoning that if you get a tax break, that is equivalent to receiving subsidies from the government. The "logic" (and I use the term loosely) is that a tax break is the same as receiving money. That then makes you subject to federal regulations governing government supported schools. Then some people will try to use that as a wedge to then be able to control what you're teaching.

What you're proposing sounds suspiciously like the voucher system. Go for it.


2,356 posted on 12/22/2005 7:43:05 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2350 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

In our state, education is, as you say, covered primarily by property taxes.

Interestingly, as a pastor, I can opt out of social security and never have to pay a dime into it if I were to consider it in conflict with some belief that I have.

If that were treated the same as parents who choose religious, private, or homeschooling, then many would say that the government is giving ME a check for the amount that I don't have to send them.

Odd, isn't it?


2,361 posted on 12/22/2005 7:50:14 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson