Oh, wait a minute, thats exactly what happened. Einstein and friends rejected Lemaitre and his own field equations because both pointed to a creation event which did not accord with Einsteins world view.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
That's unconstitutional...as unconstitutional as mandating that religion be taught by public employees.
Clearly he was a creationist in the cosmological sense. But using the word creationist, especially in the context of a thread like this, implies the biological sense (fallacy/sin of equivocation)
Do you have any evidence whatsoever that LeMaitre was a creationist in the biology sense? If you don't, you should withdraw this and apologize for libeling a great scientist.