Generally speaking, when someone argues that an observable process violates some law of nature, I'm skeptical.
If you would be more specific I might listen. I am aware that the problem of abiogenesis is deep and unsolved. But evolution is observable in real time. There is no phenomenon required for evolution that has not been observed. Mutations, insertions, duplications, chromosomal mutations -- all have been observed. None violate any laws of physics; nor does selection, the source of information, violate any law of physics.
You have every right to be skeptical. You don't have the right to slander people and treat them like cr@p.
(Well, I guess within your world view you have the "right" to do whatever you want.)
Also, the reason you're skeptical is that God has created laws that cause the physical universe to reflect his orderliness. These laws are in operation most of the time. That is why modern science, including the scientific method, was developed by people who knew that the created world would reflect the orderliness of the God who created it.
If you would be more specific I might listen. I am aware that the problem of abiogenesis is deep and unsolved.
I'm not sure which thread you're referring to. The thread I think we're on was about evolutionists slandering people who claim evolution appears to violate the laws of entropy. Anyway, as for abiogenesis, that's sort of a big problem.
But evolution is observable in real time.
I'd be happy to get into a scientific discussion of this, but given the track record of slander and disingenuity (is that a word?) from "you people", not to mention misrepresentation, I'm not sure of the value of it.
For goodness sake, you can't even admit you are driven by ideology, or certain basic presuppositions; once you can be honest with yourselves, and then honest with other people, then maybe we can make some progress.