1) You seem to have confused the Wheel of Fortune with Philosophy 101.
2) You don't know the difference between a logical fallacy and a false assumption.
3) You don't seem to be familiar with even introductory level philosophy of God.
4) You don't seem to have read my posts on a previous thread regarding Alvin Plantinga's "Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism" in which I believe we established that if you accept evolution you have destroyed it because there is no plausible basis for believing evolution equipped homo sapiens with reliable reasoning faculties (crude summary). (Before offering the trite schoolyard non-rebuttals off the top of your head, go back and read the thread, or any other discussion of the argument.)
[WHACK!!!] Another mole pops up....
Um, no, that is simply confusion on your part.
2) You don't know the difference between a logical fallacy and a false assumption.
In fact, I do. Feel free to demonstrate otherwise instead of sputtering about it.
3) You don't seem to be familiar with even introductory level philosophy of God.
All philosophy of gods is introductory level BS.
4) You don't seem to have read my posts on a previous thread regarding Alvin Plantinga's "Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism" in which I believe we established that if you accept evolution you have destroyed it because there is no plausible basis for believing evolution equipped homo sapiens with reliable reasoning faculties (crude summary).
It's still crap no matter how many times you repeat it.