I'm afraid that's something you'll have to get used to. Apparent conflicts and intuitive insights are rather common in the wastbasket of science.
Don't try to patronize me on the nature of science. You haven't earned the right. If anything, it's vice-verse.
Anyway, you've completely dodged the point. (Surprise!) What I have gotten used to is evolutionists slandering people as fools for making observations that parallel those once made by respected scientists just because science has (apparently) moved on.
You could, of course, simply say something like: "you know, the point you raise was actually considered as a a serious objection at such-and-such time, but the work of so-and-so people is considered to be a satisfactory resolution of the problem."
But no, instead we have: you're a bunch of scientifiically illerate moron liars who want to destroy education and civilization.
Why do you think that is? Probably because you're so darned confident that the facts on your side, right?