[js1138]

I saw a newer article somewhere that was better, but now I can't find it. Most of the information in this link is 5 years old.

Just remember that for every gap you fill, you create two new ones. Eventually you will have more gaps than there atoms in the universe, and ID wins.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

I'm not worried. My mind is full of gaps as it is. ;)

[RogueIsland]

Just remember that for every gap you fill, you create two new ones. Eventually you will have more gaps than there atoms in the universe, and ID wins.

That's the beauty of the "gaps" argument: the more transitional fossils you find, the more gaps you get, so transitionals actually only reinforce the lack of transitionals.

[highball]

Just remember that for every gap you fill, you create two new ones. Eventually you will have more gaps than there atoms in the universe, and ID wins.

ID wins?

You are perhaps unaware that the leading proponent of ID fully acknowledges both evolution and a common ancestor?

In other words, if you believe in ID (unless you think you know more about ID than Behe does), you also believe that humans and monkeys evolved from a common ancestor over millions of years.