[conservative blonde]

Evolution cannot be replicated therefore, it is not a science. There are many many holes in it. Much that doesn't make sense; therefore, I choose to believe in a God Creator who made things separately and not one species evolving out of the next. If you want to be the offspring of slime and goo so be it. I don't.

[Dimensio]

Are you pulling quotes whole from a creationist phamplet? You're good at tossing out inane one-liners, but you're not exactly making any rational arguments.

Evolution cannot be replicated therefore, it is not a science.

This is false. Evolution has been observed. The whole of common descent hasn't been replicated, but that's not a requirement for science.

There are many many holes in it.

Perhaps you can explain some of these holes rather than just asserting their existence?

therefore, I choose to believe in a God Creator who made things separately and not one species evolving out of the next.

This is illogical. Falsifying evolution -- which you have failed to do -- would not demonstrate the existence of a "God Creator". If you want to assert the existence of a "God Creator" then you need to provide positive evidence for such a thing.

If you wish to believe in a God on faith, fine, but don't tell me that it's a logical conclusion from rejecting the theory of evolution because it is not.

If you want to be the offspring of slime and goo so be it. I don't.

It has nothing to do with what you or I "want". You can't falsify evolution by saying that you don't like the implications.

Now, are you going to apologize for repeating the false claim that Darwin rejected evolution? Just say that you were mistaken and move on.