[CarolinaGuitarman]

Why do you say,

"I have to say my faith in evolution is declining with the noxious treatment of ID proponents."

When your posting record shows you clearly in the ID camp?

"The underpinnings of intelligent design are science.

Scientist have observed order and concluded that it is not chaos and not properly explained by randomness. This is the predominate view throughout all of science-- when one observes order we presume design or intention.

It is only in the radical Darwinian community is there an adamant faithful insistence upon order must be caused by randomness."

Posted by lonestar67 to Wolfstar
On Smoky Backroom 11/11/2005 8:26:16 PM EST · 68 of 414

[lonestar67]

My postings clearly show me in the ID camp because I think they should be heard.

That is an excellent indication of how open minded the evolution proponents on this thread are. Let's be clear, not all proponents of evolution-- including myself-- are so dogmatic.

As I noted in the alchemy example, scientists can make bad assumptions and still practice science.

This kind of bogus intolerance is hurting science not helping it.

"The radical darwinian community" is not every proponent of evolution. There is a unique group of individuals who see evolution as an intellectual sledgehammer. I am trying to figure out the motives as to why.