When "creation scientists" describe the mechanism that prevents so called "micro" evolution from continuing on to become "macro" evolution, let me know.
by definition, the Theory of Evolution is not valid science. It's the creation myth of atheists
You do realize that a great many Christians, not the least of which the entive Catholic Church, have acknowledged there is no conflict between the Bible and evolution?
You might have some doctrinal problems with Catholics, but to slander them as "athiests" because they accept evolution is probably a bit much.
"When "creation scientists" describe the mechanism that prevents so called "micro" evolution from continuing on to become "macro" evolution, let me know."
When evolutionary scientists prove the mechanism that allows micro-evolution to continue on to become macro-evolution, you let us know. The burden of such proofs is on the proponents of the theory. At least, it is under sound scientific principles. Something that evolutionists seem to struggle with.
"You do realize that a great many Christians, not the least of which the entive Catholic Church, have acknowledged there is no conflict between the Bible and evolution?"
Stunning bit of scientific evidence there.....
"You might have some doctrinal problems with Catholics, but to slander them as "athiests" because they accept evolution is probably a bit much."
I didn't refer to them in any way shape or form as "atheists." You may wish to read more carefully. I described the theory of evolution as the creation myths of atheists. Because the Catholic Church has chosen to compromise their doctrine by attempting to merge the creation myth of another faith into their belief system is unfortunate. And it would be one of several doctrinal differences I have with the Catholic Church. Those differences are the main reason I left Catholicism.
I think its called genetics. Even though you can run through thousands of generations of fruit flies in a short time you still end up with fruit flies.
..the entive Catholic Church..