[Full Court]

How many of his videos did he sucker you into buying? :)

I wouldn't have to buy any, he allows people to copy them and give them away.

But one of my favorites is where is exposes the frauds in evolution like Piltdoan Man, Glued Moths, human fetuses drawn to look like pig fetuses, the way Hawking pretends like the Law of recapitulation just doesn't exist. Oh, the list is long.

See, people who believe in the religion of evolution have to make us fairy tales to prove their "theory."

Sad.

[Thatcherite]

The theory of evolution has about 5 frauds associated with it in the last 150 years. Peppered moths are not a fraud, the photographic techniques used are absolutely standard, and are designed to show why the colouring adaption is useful.

All the real frauds were all exposed by the normal process of science. Not one was exposed by a creationist. In fact Piltdown man was increasingly seen as an irrelevant anomaly precisely because it didn't fit in with the pattern of hominid finds. Because creationists don't have any theory that explains the pattern of fossil finds they had no basis for rejecting Piltdown.

Most churches would die for the freedom from fraud and error associated with ToE over the last 150 years, and its demonstrable ability to police itself and to discover its own frauds and errors.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"But one of my favorites is where is exposes the frauds in evolution like Piltdoan Man, Glued Moths, human fetuses drawn to look like pig fetuses, the way Hawking pretends like the Law of recapitulation just doesn't exist. Oh, the list is long."

Piltdownman was exposed by evolutionists decades ago. The moths, as I already told you, were not glued on to the trees in the photos that were taken of them individually. This would be 99% of the photos of them. Haeckel's drawings were exposed almost immediately, and were not used by Darwin to promote evolution. Hawking? Do you mean the physicist?

Here's a link I am sure you will not look at:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wells/iconob.html

" See, people who believe in the religion of evolution have to make us fairy tales to prove their "theory."

Sad."

Some people like Hovind (who has a fake degree) have to dupe uneducated boobs out of their money in order to make a living.

[PatrickHenry]

... the frauds in evolution like Piltdoan [sic] Man, Glued Moths, human fetuses drawn to look like pig fetuses ...

I know this won't help you. It's for the lurkers -- pretty much the whole catalogue of "frauds" on the evolution side (no need to detail the long, woeful list of creationist frauds, as it's beyond my hard drive's capacity to present):

Piltdown Man. Science (not creationism) uncovered the fraud.
Nebraska Man. NEW Also: Nebraska Man in Textbooks? It wasn't much of a fraud.
Peppered Moths. Another non-issue.
Haeckel's Embryos. Yet another.
Ichneumon's Discussion of Haeckel's embryo drawings. A FreeRepublic post (#62).
Archaeopteryx. Despite howls from creationists, it's not a fake.
Archaeoraptor. A crude fake, publicized by Nat'l Geographic, then quickly exposed.
Lucy. The "fraud" claim is actually a creationist fraud.

[Dimensio]

But one of my favorites is where is exposes the frauds in evolution like Piltdoan Man, Glued Moths, human fetuses drawn to look like pig fetuses, the way Hawking pretends like the Law of recapitulation just doesn't exist.

Hmm, let's see. You were already told about why the moth issue was not actually fraud, but rather than accept that or attempt to explain why you disagree with the "not fraud" assessment you simply repeat your initial claim as though it were never debunked. Looks like you're just another creationist liar.