Replies

The peppered moth is a fine example of natural selection in action. There is nothing wrong wrong with using it.

What Hovind exposes is the fact that believers in the religion of evolutionist theory GLUED the moths to trees to try and support their "thoery."

Needless to say, after the evolutionist got through pasting the moths to tress, they were still moths.

Yeah Kent for exposing the ignorant people behind evolution!!!

"What Hovind exposes is the fact that believers in the religion of evolutionist theory GLUED the moths to trees to try and support their "thoery.""

No, that is not what happened. It was only in a few pictures that this was done, and only to have two moths shown together, a light and a dark one side by side for contrast. This would probably never happen in nature, but was necessary for the comparison. The rest of the pictures were of single moths that were photographed on tree trunks; these were not *glued* there. They were photographed in the wild as is. Creationists who use this in an effort to discredit the studies are woefully ignorant about how nature photography works.

" Needless to say, after the evolutionist got through pasting the moths to tress, they were still moths."

Since nobody was saying the study was an example of speciation, what is your point?

" Yeah Kent for exposing the ignorant people behind evolution!!!"

How many of his videos did he sucker you into buying? :)

[What Hovind exposes is the fact that believers in the religion of evolutionist theory GLUED the moths to trees to try and support their "thoery."]

At first I thought this was really good and very subtle satire.

Then I realized you're serious.