These virus DNA segments are yet another re-verification of evolution. Evolution predicts that any new technology with the ability to connect different species will reconfirm the apparent relationships found in the initial morphological and geological evidence (within the bounds of error, of course).
The new ERV virus DNA sequences common between primates and humans reconfirm, once again, the early morphological data. Just as Evolution predicted before DNA sequencing was available.
What has ID predicted and later confirmed with subsequent data?
Anybody ever stop to think that evo scientists are in it for the money? Shhhhhhhhhh
Coyne and his fellow Darwinists love to chant that the evidence for Darwinism is "overwhelming" -- and so it is, if we have to shovel it. How could it be otherwise? For decades, Darwinism has enjoyed a taxpayer-supported monopoly in the biological sciences. Scores of journals dedicated to advancing it have churned out literally tons of articles. Anyone who actually reads the literature of evolutionary biology with an open mind, however, soon realizes that almost all of it simply assumes that the theory is true. What is "overwhelming" is not the evidence, but the faith it takes to call Darwinian evolution a fact even after 150 years of failing to find much of any evidence for its core tenets.
This is why Darwinists cannot allow biology students to think critically about evolution, much less to hear about alternative theories such as intelligent design.
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2933&program=CSC+-+Views+and+News