Replies

This is getting funny. I'm having a belly laugh here.

I give you a link showing 700 scientists, and then I give you another link showing over 50 scientists, and you give me the credentials for only a couple, that you SAY are not worthy, & that's supposed to mean something??

OK, OK. Since I'm so nice, here's 400 more scientists, so you can pick a couple out and tell me something that wrong with them. I'm still laughing over all this.

Ready?

Here goes:

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=443

I give you a link showing 700 scientists, and then I give you another link showing over 50 scientists, and you give me the credentials for only a couple, that you SAY are not worthy, & that's supposed to mean something

You gave me a list of about 20 scientists that had published papers favoring ID and I revealed that almost none had any graduate level biology experience.

A couple of the guys your listed aren't even scientists and haven't even been to college. These guys might be sharp, but your list was supposed to represent the best of biological science world.

As I predicted, essentially all of the ID proponents aren't scientists in biology but are engineers or computer scientists with a strong interest or even a degree in religious studies.