[whispering out loud]

The statement was fallacious? I think not, I could not begin to name the languages that the "Holy Bible" has been translated to, I personally have seen American of course, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, and French. But there are more, and there are new translations being written every day.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I personally have seen American of course,..."

American is not a language.

[Gumlegs]

The statement was fallacious? I think not, I could not begin to name the languages that the "Holy Bible" has been translated to, I personally have seen American of course, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, and French. But there are more, and there are new translations being written every day.

Wow. I've never seen a point missed by anywhere near that much. Here's the point: The number of languages a book has been translated into has no bearing whatever on the accuracy of its contents.

[Dimensio]

The statement was fallacious?

Yes.

I think not,

That only demonstrates your lack of reasoning ability.

I could not begin to name the languages that the "Holy Bible" has been translated to, I personally have seen American of course, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, and French. But there are more, and there are new translations being written every day.

The number of languages into which the Bible has been translated has no bearing whatsoever on the truth value of any statement within the Bible. Arguing otherwise is fallacious.